The Power of Polygraph Tests in Graft Investigations
When it comes to fighting corruption, every tool available must be utilized to ensure the integrity of our institutions. One such tool that has been gaining traction is the polygraph test, a powerful method that can provide crucial insights into cases of graft and misconduct.
What is a Polygraph Test?
A polygraph test, commonly known as a lie detector test, is a scientific method used to detect deception by measuring physiological responses such as heart rate, blood pressure, respiration, and skin conductivity. While the results of polygraph tests are not admissible in court, they can play a significant role in guiding investigators towards the truth.
How the MACC Utilizes Polygraph Tests
The Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) has recognized the value of polygraph tests in their investigations. With more than 20 trained officers and at least 10 machines available, the MACC is now incorporating polygraph tests as a crucial step in their corruption inquiries.
Chief Commissioner Tan Sri Azam Baki emphasized that polygraph tests are not only used in ongoing investigations but also in screening potential employees to ensure the integrity of their workforce. The tests have proven to be 97% accurate, making them a reliable tool in uncovering the truth.
The Role of Polygraph Tests in Investigations
During an investigation, individuals may be offered a polygraph test to support their claims of innocence. If the results are favorable, it can prompt a reassessment of the case and the evidence against the individual. However, if the test indicates deception, it provides investigators with valuable leads for further inquiry.
It is important to note that individuals cannot be compelled to take a polygraph test. Instead, they are offered the opportunity to undergo the test to substantiate their statements. This approach allows investigators to gather additional intelligence and make informed decisions in their pursuit of justice.
The Legal Implications of Polygraph Tests
While polygraph tests are not admissible as evidence in court, they can serve as supporting documentation to strengthen the primary evidence in a case. Criminal defense lawyer Mohd Hezri Shaharil explained that the credibility of polygraph test results is subject to judicial scrutiny, and their value lies in complementing existing evidence.
Ultimately, the use of polygraph tests in corruption investigations represents a proactive step towards combating misconduct and upholding the rule of law. By incorporating this advanced tool into their practices, the MACC demonstrates a commitment to thorough and effective anti-corruption measures.
Image source: The Star
