Revolutionizing Gambling Ads vs. Teen Social Media Ban

The government’s proposed gambling advertising reforms have been stalled for nearly a year and a half, prompting concerns about the need for thorough policy design. In contrast, Communications Minister Michelle Rowland’s bill to ban under-16s from accessing social media has not faced the same level of scrutiny.

Time

Teen Social Media Ban:

• The social media ban inquiry allowed only three hours to hear from 12 witnesses.
• The public was given just one day to submit their responses, resulting in 15,000 submissions.
• A previous inquiry into social media did not recommend an age-based ban.
  

  Gambling Advertising Reform:
  

• The standing committee on social and legal policy affairs conducted an inquiry into online gambling over six months.
• The committee recommended a comprehensive ban on all forms of online gambling advertising.
• The government consulted extensively with the industry before proposing watered-down regulations.
  

  Expertise
  

  Teen Social Media Ban:
  

• Clinical psychologist Dr. Danielle Einstein highlighted the harms of social media on young people.
• The Office of Impact Analysis supported the social media ban with research that has been questioned by experts.
  

  Gambling Advertising Reform:
  

• Public health experts and former politicians advocated for a total ban on gambling advertising.
• The push for reform has garnered support from various stakeholders.

  The contrast between the two bills underscores the importance of comprehensive policy design and thorough scrutiny to ensure positive outcomes. As the government continues to navigate these complex issues, it is essential to consider expert insights and public feedback to create effective and impactful reforms.

  —

  FAQs

  1. Why have the government’s gambling advertising reforms stalled?
     • The reforms have faced delays due to extensive consultations and the need for thorough policy design.
  2. What concerns have been raised about the social media ban for under-16s?
     • Critics have questioned the evidence supporting the ban and the limited time given for public input.