Man with Disability Denied Opportunity to Contribute to Teen Social Media Ban Inquiry
A man, identified as Oliver (pseudonym granted for privacy reasons), revealed that he was unable to participate in the federal government’s inquiry on the snap teen social media ban. His disability hindered his ability to make a submission, as the parliamentary committee did not respond to his request for accommodations.
Labor’s Legislation and Committee Process
Recently, Labor referred draft legislation aiming to restrict children under 16 from having social media accounts to the committee process. During the short submission period, the committee received approximately 15,000 submissions. This influx of feedback culminated in a three-hour hearing on Monday, followed by the publication of a report on Tuesday night.
The committee recommended passing the ban, contingent on the integration of eight additional recommendations into the bill.
Oliver’s Unsuccessful Attempt to Contribute
Despite the multitude of submissions, Oliver’s input was notably absent. He had requested an extension to formulate a response due to his neurodivergence. In an email to the committee secretary, he expressed his need for additional time, citing his neurodivergent condition.
Unfortunately, neither Oliver nor the publication received a response from the committee’s secretariat. Consequently, Oliver was unable to make a submission.
He emphasized the importance of ensuring disability access in the political process, stating that it should not be merely symbolic but should enable meaningful engagement for Australians with disabilities.
Concerns Raised by Disability Advocacy Groups
Organizations representing young Australians with disabilities have voiced concerns about the potential impact of the teen social media ban. Children and Young People with Disability Australia submitted a document highlighting the importance of social media for the individuals they represent. They also expressed apprehension about age assurance and verification technologies posing barriers to access.
Oliver expressed disappointment in the government’s handling of the situation, particularly its lack of consideration for children with disabilities who may be affected by the proposed ban.
He stressed the necessity for the government to listen to and consider the perspectives of individuals with disabilities in policy-making processes.
Conclusion
Oliver’s experience sheds light on the challenges faced by individuals with disabilities in engaging with government inquiries and decision-making processes. It underscores the importance of ensuring inclusivity and accessibility in all aspects of policy development.
FAQs
How many submissions were received by the committee?
The committee received approximately 15,000 submissions during the brief open submission period.
What concerns were raised by disability advocacy groups?
Disability advocacy groups expressed concerns about the potential impact of the teen social media ban on young Australians with disabilities. They highlighted the importance of social media for this demographic and noted potential barriers to access posed by age verification technologies.