A surge in retail interest has pushed derivatives-enhanced exchange-traded funds (ETFs) into the spotlight, with influencers on platforms like TikTok, YouTube, and Reddit promoting these funds as vehicles for high-yield returns—sometimes even boasting payouts exceeding 100%. These products, which leverage options strategies to amplify gains from big names like Nvidia Corp. and Tesla Inc., have drawn billions from individual investors, seeking quick profits. But how sustainable are these high returns, and at what cost?
This year alone, retail investors have poured over $50 billion into these ETF strategies, propelling issuers to launch new funds at a frenetic pace. As the competition for inflows and fees intensifies across the $10 trillion ETF market, new players and established firms alike are benefiting from the boom. However, as these products become increasingly popular, market professionals and regulators are expressing concerns about whether investors truly grasp the risks involved.
While some ETFs promise to hedge against market downturns and generate income through complex strategies such as “covered call” or “laddered buffer,” the underlying complexity of these products could backfire. Sophisticated tactics like volatility drag and the erosion of net-asset value (NAV) are rarely explained clearly, leaving day traders vulnerable to significant losses, even as they chase eye-catching yields.
According to Hamilton Reiner, manager of JPMorgan’s $36 billion Equity Premium Income ETF (JEPI), which helped spark the growth in derivatives-based funds, investors need to fully understand what they’re getting into. “Paying yields of 30% or more inevitably puts pressure on the ETF’s net-asset value,” Reiner said. “There’s no free lunch; there are always trade-offs.”
Despite these warnings, retail investors are diving in, spurred by the memory of 2021’s meme stock frenzy. This growing corner of the ETF market took off during the 2022 bear market. As investors sought safe havens, products like the JEPI fund, which offers a more conservative yield of around 8%, gained significant traction. The success of funds like JEPI inspired a gold rush among providers, who rolled out options-enhanced ETFs designed to capture outsized returns on individual stocks. As a result, assets in derivatives-based ETFs have grown sixfold in the past five years to a staggering $300 billion.
The Risks Behind the Hype
Many of these products generate returns by selling options—derivatives contracts that allow investors to generate cash by betting on the future direction of stocks. The appeal is simple: sell options, collect premiums, and distribute them as dividends. However, while these funds may look defensive, offering protection during market downturns, they also tend to underperform the broader market during rallies. For example, YieldMax’s Coin Option Income Strategy ETF (CONY) has returned more than 100% of its share value as cash over the past year, but due to a decline in its share price, it has lagged behind its underlying asset, Coinbase Global Inc.
As more retail investors flock to these high-yield products, regulators are becoming increasingly uneasy. The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has raised concerns about the complexity of these products, particularly when they are marketed without adequately explaining the risks. According to Cristina Martin Firvida, the SEC’s investor advocate, “The number of self-directed investors has grown, but so has the complexity of the products available to them.”
Still, these ETFs disclose their risks in prospectuses, making it clear that investors are sacrificing potential upside in exchange for income. Despite the risk of underperformance, many investors are willing to accept the trade-off in exchange for regular payouts. However, the nuances of how these strategies work—and the associated risks—often get lost in the noise of online investment forums, where high-yield ETFs are hyped without much scrutiny.
The Appeal of Leveraged Returns
Another trend fueling the ETF boom is the rise of leveraged ETFs, which magnify returns by using derivatives to double or even triple the daily movements of a stock or index. While these products are loved by day traders for their potential to deliver massive short-term gains, they can also rack up significant losses quickly. Leveraged ETFs often have high running costs, making them less suitable for long-term investors.
ETF industry expert Dave Nadig warns of a “proliferation problem” within the market, noting that many of the new products cater more to speculation than to sound long-term investment strategies. “We’re seeing a lot of high-emotion marketing, with claims like ‘triple this, double that,’” Nadig said. “This feels like a free-for-all, and it’s mostly to the detriment of investors.”
The flood of ETF launches can be traced back to regulatory changes. In 2019, the SEC introduced the ETF Rule, which streamlined the approval process for new funds. This rule, along with a 2020 shift that made certain leveraged ETFs easier to launch, has lowered barriers to entry and fueled the growth of products targeting retail investors.
A Cautionary Tale
While many investors are lured by the promise of high yields, those who don’t fully understand the mechanics of these ETFs may face harsh lessons. David Streeter, a Florida-based retiree, learned this the hard way when he invested in the YieldMax TSLA Option Income ETF (TSLY), suffering a 40% loss before deciding to sell. “Investors need to be cautious when they see double-digit distributions,” Streeter said. “Understand how these funds work.”
Despite the risks, the appetite for high-yield ETFs continues to grow. Some funds, such as a leveraged Nvidia ETF, have skyrocketed in popularity, with assets ballooning from $200 million to $5 billion in 2024 alone. While traders have enjoyed monthly gains as high as 59%, the potential for steep losses remains a looming threat.
As the trend shows no sign of slowing, market professionals urge investors to dig deeper into the risks before diving into high-yield ETFs. “The ETF wrapper is incredible, but not everything is better in an ETF,” says Reiner.